This year has been a year of disappointing sequels. The one most prevalent in my mind is one that the whole blogosphere was flailing about since they read the second book: Allegiant. Even though I was less in love with Insurgent than I wanted to be, I was still really excited for the finale. But I was disappointed. I felt like maybe it was stretched too far and I just didn’t feel the spark anymore. Is it possible that it’s the distance between instalments that does it for me?
I think that was definitely the
case for Sarah Crossan’s Resist. Clearly
remember adoring Breathe, and my review
supports that, but I didn’t finish Resist.
I don’t think I even got a quarter of the way through before I put it down
never to pick it up again. I couldn’t remember a single thing about the first
book and I found I didn’t really care either. I had no connection with
characters and a world I had previously loved. I was really upset, but I felt
nothing when I deleted my e-proof off of my Kindle.
The dwindling of my love was a
little different with Monsters, the
final book in Ilsa J Bick’s trilogy. A trilogy in which I was consumed by the
first two books. I read a catch up of the series before beginning Monsters so I wasn’t thwarted by my poor
memory and I still didn’t click. This series has been epic from the beginning and
each book is very long and complex, but I think it went a little far in the
final instalment. I honestly think it could have ended somewhere in the second
book and that it was dragged out. More and more characters and points of view
were thrown in and it was full-throttle danger and imminent death for
characters that I had fallen in love with, but by the end of Monsters, I didn’t care anymore. I just
wanted it to be over so I could move on.
I felt similarly about the unnecessary
length of the novel when it came to Bitterblue.
This trilogy captured my heart and held it hostage for both Graceling and Fire so I was pretty crushed when I didn’t fall in love with Bitterblue. I don’t think that
Bitterblue herself was as engaging as Katsa and Fire were and that’s what draws
me in. I also thought it was slow and too information heavy. My favourite parts
were the ones that included Po and Katsa, to be honest. Luckily, I’m choosing
to hold onto how mind-blowingly amazing Garceling
and Fire are instead of dwelling
on the final companion.
Julie Kagawa’s world of the
Nevernever is one of my very favourites. I legitimately want to go there and
trade a memory for the Sight. I was gutted to see The Iron Fey trilogy and Meghan and Ash’s story end so the
announcement of The Call of the Forgotten
spin-off series starring Meghan’s brother, Ethan, made me super happy. We’re
on book two now, The Iron Traitor, and
I’m completely underwhelmed. There are lots of the same characters and the same
world, but the spark is missing. I just want Meghan and Ash back. I do still
love the Nevernever though. I’m hoping that this spin-off might be redeemed by
the next (and possibly final?) book, but I don;t have my hopes up.
And finally, the big one. I spent
two years waiting for Clockwork Princess.
Cassandra Clare is one of my favourite authors and I love every word she
puts to paper, the original ending of The
Mortal Instruments series – City of
Glass – was perfection and so I had every faith that Clockwork Princess would make me bawl and leave me happy and satisfied.
Instead, I felt cheated. I adored it most of the way through, some moments even
more, and then came the ending and specifically, the epilogue. I felt like she
was slightly pandering to both lots of shippers and I was so disappointed. I mean,
it was a satisfying ending for Tessa, but I felt cheated and that she’s cheated
the characters as well. I was so, so disappointed that I had cried for these
characters multiple times, that I had cheered for them, worried for them and
then it was over the way it was over. Now I’m terrified for City of Heavenly Fire. If that ends in
disappointment, I’ll be devastated – I’ve been with that series and those
characters for a very long time. Here’s hoping...
There are so many reasons why a
sequel might fail to live up to my expectations and it’s interesting how each
of these is a mixture of several different elements. But it’s clear to me that
they all come down to one thing: a connection, whether that be with the world,
the plot or the characters, needs to be there and have remained strong since I read
the last instalment of the series. That’s a pretty tall order but I could reel
off a huge list of authors who’ve done just that. Including Rachel Caine,
Richelle Mead, Louise Rennison, usually Cassandra Clare, usually Julie Kagawa,
Tahereh Mafi, Sarah J Maas. It’s such a shame as I end up forgetting about and
disregarding authors who’s future books I may love.
I say bring back the
standalone. You can’t go wrong with those.
Series or standalone? How do
you make sure you remember previous books in a series? Did any of you
absolutely love any of the sequels I’ve mentioned?
Sophie
I generally prefer standalones as it can be ages between reading installments and I have to rely on the books reminding me what happened. Having said that there are some series books / sequels that I love - a few I've read recently have been even better than the first.
ReplyDeleteBut I generally do prefer standalones :)
Yay for Morganville not falling in this category! But yeah, I think with Resist and Allegiant, the gap between books and trying to tie up loose ends sort of failed the ending of the series. Sucks when that happens, so yeah, standalones and companion novels are pretty epic for that reason :)
ReplyDeleteUgh. I've given up on so many sequels and books in a series this year. More than 20, I'd say that I will never attempt to read. It's so hard to get that second book right or to maintain the same level of awesome across many books :(
ReplyDelete